19th Judicial Circuit
Child Representative/Guardian Ad Litem Training
College of Lake County – September 11-12, 2012
- Differing Roles in Interview Process for Attorneys/Guardian Ad Litem/Child Representative*750 ILCS 5/506*In Re Marriage of Bates, 212 ILL. 2d 489, 289 ILL.Dec. 218, 819 N.E. 2d 714 (2004)*In Re Marriage of Kostusik, 361 ILL.App.3d 103, 296 ILL.Dec. 732, 836 N.E 2d 147 (1st Dist., 2005)
- Right to Communicate with 604(b) and/or 604.5 Experts
- Manner of Communication
- Discoverable Information
- Who is Interviewing Who
- Preparation before Interview
- Do the Interview yourself
- List of questions ahead of time
- Questions on behalf of children
- Questions on behalf of attorney
- Research about evaluator background
- Type of Expert Needed
- Cost
- Retainer Payments – Confirmed
- Costs and Billing Practices
- Timing of Payments
- Itemized Billing Statements
- Points of Interest
- Question Role/Parameters of Evaluators
- Type of Evaluation to be Performed
- Timeline for Completion of Evaluation
- Questionnaire and Approach to Interviews
- Needs for Psychological Testing – Outside Expert
- Types of Psychological Testing to be Initiated
- Maintain Notes of Interviews and Investigations
- Discuss Role of Attorney/GAL/Child Rep. in Process
- Any Particular Bias/Prejudice that would impact the Case
- Who is going to do the work
- Preparation before Interview
- Deposing Child Custody Expert Significantly Different than Interview
- Discovery is Key – Use Your Own Subpoena and Rider
- GET ENTIRE FILE AHEAD OF TIME AND READ IT
- Background
- Examination of Curriculum Vitae
- Examine Training Background and Areas of Specialty (Who trained under)
- Experience as Testifying Experts
- Affiliations and Organizations
- Board Certified – “What does that mean”
- Potential Bias or Prejudice with Litigants, Lawyers, Courts, Issues, Etc.
- Any times criticized or reprimanded, etc.
- Process of Evaluation – Industry Standards*Child Custody Evaluation Standards of American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers (2010 Edition)**American Psychological Association Guidelines for Child Custody Evaluations***Association of Family and Conciliation Courts Model Standards of Professional Practice for Child Custody Evaluations
- Interviews
- Timing and Length of Interviews (Reasons Why)
- # of Interviews with Each Party/Child (Alone/Together)
- Method of Note-taking (handwritten and typed)
- Previous Questionnaires and/or Live Interviews
- Who present during Interviews and Where Interviewed
- Third Party Contacts (Phone/Person/Writing)
- Home Visits vs. Office Visits (Differences/Why)
- Information Gathering
- Collateral Contacts -Solicited or Requested
- Attorney or Legal Contacts -Written or Oral
- Actively Seeking Information or Accepting Only what is presented
- Records from Other Therapists or Counselors (Releases)
- Records from Schools
- Watch for Vague Summaries of Sources of Information
- Information gathered but not included in Report (why not)
- Conflicting Information (how decide what is more important)
- Time period when information gathered/reviewed
- Questions for Parties about information or just accepted/discarded
- Psychological Testing
- New Expert or Same Expert
- Types of Tests to be Performed
- Requested by Litigant or Expert
- Who Grades Tests (credentials of that person)
- Reliability of Testing Data
- Preservation of Data
- Objective vs. Subjective Scoring and Conclusions
- Other Interpretations Possible
- Writing of Report
- Prior Drafts
- Who drafted Report
- Time to prepare Report
- What Considered/What Discarded (Why)
- Follow-up after data gathered and interviews completed
- Time Report Submitted vs. Current Events
- Update necessary for any reason
- Interviews
- Discovery is Key – Use Your Own Subpoena and Rider